Susan Haack
Susan Haack.JPG
Susan Haack at the University of Miami,
Spring 2005
Born 1945
England
Era Contemporary philosophy
Region Western Philosophy
School Analytic
Main interests
Philosophy of science
Philosophy of logic
Epistemology
Pragmatism
Charles Sanders Peirce
Notable ideas
Foundherentism
Crossword puzzle model of science

Susan Haack (born 1945, England) is an English professor of philosophy and law at the University of Miami in the United States. She has written on logic, the philosophy of language, epistemology, and metaphysics. Her pragmatism follows that of Charles Sanders Peirce.

Contents

Career[edit]

Haack is a graduate of the University of Oxford and the University of Cambridge. At Oxford, she studied at St. Hilda's College, where her first philosophy teacher was Jean Austin, the widow of J. L. Austin. As an undergraduate, she took Politics, Philosophy and Economics and said of her taste for philosophy: "initially, the “politics” part that most appealed to me. But somewhere down the line, despite encouragement from my politics tutor to pursue that subject, philosophy took over."[1]

She studied Plato with Gilbert Ryle and logic with Michael Dummett. David Pears supervised her B.Phil. dissertation on ambiguity. At Cambridge, she wrote her Ph.D. under the supervision of Timothy Smiley. She held the positions of Fellow of New Hall, Cambridge and professor of philosophy at the University of Warwick before taking her current position at the University of Miami.

Haack has said of her career that she is "very independent":

rather than follow philosophical fads and fashions, I pursue questions I believe are important, and tackle them in the ways that seem most likely to yield results; I am beholden to no clique or citation cartel; I put no stock in the ranking of philosophy graduate programs over which my colleagues obsess; I accept no research or travel funds from my university; I avoid publishing in journals that insist on taking all the rights to my work; etc., etc. Naturally, this independence comes at a price; but it also earns me the freedom to do the best work I can, without self-censorship, and to communicate with a much wider audience than the usual “niche literature” does[1]

Ideas[edit]

Haack's major contribution to philosophy, in the 1993 book Evidence and Inquiry is her epistemological theory called foundherentism,[2][3][4] which is her attempt to avoid the logical problems of both pure foundationalism (which is susceptible to infinite regress) and pure coherentism (which is susceptible to circularity). She illustrates this idea with the metaphor of the crossword puzzle. A highly simplified version of this proceeds as follows: Finding an answer using a clue is analogous to a foundational source (grounded in empirical evidence). Making sure that the interlocking words are mutually sensible is analogous to justification through coherence. Both are necessary components in the justification of knowledge. At least one scholar has claimed that Haack's foundherentism collapses into foundationalism upon further inspection.[5]

Haack has been a fierce critic of Richard Rorty.[6][7] She wrote a play, We Pragmatists ...: Peirce and Rorty in Conversation, consisting entirely of quotes from both philosophers. She performed the role of Peirce. Haack published a vigorous essay[8] in the New Criterion, taking strong exception to many of Rorty's views, especially his claim to be a sort of pragmatist.

Haack (1998) is highly critical of the view that there is a feminine perspective on logic and scientific truth. She holds that many feminist critiques of science and philosophy are overly concerned with 'political correctness'[9].

She has written for Free Inquiry magazine and the "Council for Secular Humanism". Haack's work has been reviewed and cited in the popular press, such as The Times Literary Supplement as well as in academic journals.

Memberships[edit]

Haack is an honorary member of Phi Beta Kappa Society and Phi Kappa Phi, a past President of the Charles S. Peirce Society, and a past member of the U.S./UK Educational Commission.

Select Writings by Haack[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b "Interview with Susan Haack". Richard Carrier Blogs. 6 May 2012. Retrieved 11 May 2012. 
  2. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite jstor}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by jstor:2108389, please use {{cite journal}} with |jstor=2108389 instead.
  3. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite jstor}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by jstor:20129822, please use {{cite journal}} with |jstor=20129822 instead.
  4. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite jstor}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by jstor:2660334, please use {{cite journal}} with |jstor=2660334 instead.
  5. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1007/s11229-006-9108-y, please use {{cite journal}} with |doi=10.1007/s11229-006-9108-y instead.
  6. ^ Susan Haack (1993). Evidence and Inquiry (Evidence and inquiry ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-11851-9. 0631118519 . Chapter 9: "Vulgar Pragmatism: an Unedifying Prospect".
  7. ^ Richard Rorty entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  8. ^ Haack, Susan (November 1997). "Vulgar Rortyism", The New Criterion.
  9. ^ Haack, Susan.1998 Manifesto of a passionate moderate: unfashionable essays University of Chicago Press

Bibliography[edit]

External links[edit]

Template:Persondata