Second International Workshop on
Regulated Agent-Based Social Systems:
Theories and Applications (RASTA'03)
Workshop date: 23 June, 2003
Abstract for
- 11:30 - 12:15
- Utility in Interacting Markets? - A Position Paper -
Luis Antunes, Joao Faria, and Helder Coelho
Neoclassical economics postulates utility theory as a central means to
produce and explain decisions of rational agents. In decision domains
such as markets, it should be supposedly easy to fulfill the set of
rigid conditions presupposed by utility theory, and fully
explain/predict the observed behaviours. Despite all the criticism, in
multi-agent systems, utility theory is still usually adopted to
produce choosing behaviour. And even global outcomes (many times
deemed `emergent') can be extrapolated from that `perfect world' view,
the most common being the capitalist motto that the world is better if
everyone pursues his own selfinterest.
In this paper we take an
experimental shot into the effects of removing the assumptions of
utility theory. This is a further effort to demonstrate the kind of
misleading conclusions that can be (and usually are) extracted from
models based on utility theory. We argue that utility theory is ill,
and the cure is to consider choices as volition-dependent, as much as
reason-dependent. We are concerned with the use of such economics
concepts in the multi-agent systems community. Artificial intelligence
was born against a utilitarian view of rational agents, and it is
surprising that the use of a homo oeconomicus still finds so many
adepts in the field.
Last modified: 12.06.2003
Daniel Moldt
Programme of RASTA'03: http://www2.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/tgi/events/rasta03/programme.html